Have raged about this previously - about the peculiar idiosyncrasy of today's testosterone-charged virile youth who persist in hiding their lean, mean forms under shapeless, unflattering sports tees. What's that all about? Teenage rebellion, anti-establishment and a touch of sloppiness sure but do they have to look bad while doing all that? Haven't they seen James Dean, the original Rebel without a Cause? Now that man combined all the above - and still managed to look helluva hot doing it.
But that's not the worst of it. Heterosexual teenage boys have fallen even lower on the sartorial scale. Just today, I saw a youthful hip-hop-rapper wannabe / dirty Bel Ami twink parading in town with his red flamingo boxers brazenly showing underneath his low-hanging jeans ( how exactly do they keep them from falling?! ). I was just this close to giving his jeans a good hard tug to send them tumbling - or to give him an inadvertent wedgie.
Look, I don't mind a little bit of label showing ( pretty hot actually! ) but having half your butt hanging off the edge if a bit much. Come on, not even my wet dreams matinee star Chris Evans could pull off that look - and that's saying a lot!
Why exactly do they do that? Can't they afford belts? Are well-fitting trousers far beyond their limited reach? Doesn't anyone find it odd that the girls are getting tighter, skankier and more revealing ensembles while the boys are edging towards tent-like burqas and denim so low that their collective ass cleavages are showing?